By Ian Juby, December 2000
The enigma of Gentry'sHalos:
began my investigations into Creation Science almost
twelve years ago when I gave my life back to Jesus Christ. Intellectuals
are driven by a "need to know" force within them. Being of an intellectual
mind, I asked questions - and lots of them, regarding Creation studies.
I first came across Dr. Duane Gish and the folks from the Institute for Creation
Research who certainly spurned me on the road of my own discovery.
However, it was while attending Missions training at the former Last Days
Ministries in Texas that one of my fellow students introduced me, via video,
to a man named Dr. Carl Baugh. This man had come to LDM to record a
six hour lecture series (all done off the top of his head by the way!) and
it was a lecture series that had me glued to my seat. This single,
indirect meeting altered my life and both introduced me to, and intrigued
me with, his "Creation Model". This also led me to my own investigations
as well as researching numerous other works of tremendous men and women of
science and of God.
I had the honour and privilegeof
sharing on the subject of this essay to the 3,500 people who filtered through
the fourth annual Creation Fair held in Glen Rose, Texas. I too, have also
now held six hour public lectures on Creation and Evolution but there's not
much doubt that Gentry's enigmatic halos are one of my favourite studies and
subjects.
The enigma begins by a study of
rings left behind in the Granite crust of the earth, namely in the Biotite(Mica)
crystals in the rock.
(PO218 Radiohalo,courtesy of
Earth Science Associates.
Used with permission)
Dr. Robert Gentry1took
over hundreds of thousands of samples of the granite crust world wide and
consistently found these halos formed in the rock. As you can see in
the picture, it is a series of microscopic rings (or "halos") formed around
a speck particle. The particle is a radioactive element trapped in
the rock when it was formed. As the element broke down radio actively
(through a process called Radioactive Decay) it left behind a ring of radiation
damage with each step. We know precisely which element it was by the
ring pattern and the size of the rings, and we know by experimentation in
the lab just how fast these radioactive particles break down.
Now understand that geologists basically agree that
at one point in our past the entire granite crust was together in one piece,
not broken up into continents and such as it is now. It formed one giant
continent (typically referred to as "Pangea") and wrapped around the entire
globe as one solid structure. At some point in our past this crust
broke up, drifted apart and formed our continents, folding and buckling into
Mountain ranges and trenches.
According to uniformatarianist theory, this gigantic crystal
structure formed out of molten lava and should have taken in the vicinity
of 300 Million years or more to grow. This is in stark contrast to
what the bible claims in that the Lord created this planet in less than a
day.
The Evidence and
how it works: (AKA: Gentry's halos simplified - sort of)
Sorry to get technical on you,but
bear with me - this gets fun.
In his samples, Gentry found parentless
polonium halos (Polonium, symbolized by PO, is an element). Radioactive
breakdown occurs when a heavy, radioactive element loses a part of itself,
say an electron. When this part flies off (this is what we call "Radiation"),
we are left with this element which is now different atomically - it has
a completely different structure. It is a new element, a daughter
element. That element, before it lost its electron, was a parent
element. The chain continues when the new daughter element which is
also unstable, loses another particle. It now becomes still yet another daughter
element in the generations of radioactive breakdown.
In this case, Uranium breaks down
(decays) through a series of generational steps: Uranium breaks down
into Thorium, which breaks down into Protactinium (Just try to say
that one three times fast!), to a different type of Uranium, to a different
type of Thorium, to Radium, to Radon, to... Polonium!
The generations continue on but
I think you get the point; Polonium is part of the natural, radioactive
decay chain of Uranium to Lead. If you want to get technical about it,
here is a diagram of the complete chain of generations:
Congratulations, you just received
a crash course in nuclear physics. But we're not finished yet.
When we say that Gentry found
"Parentless" polonium halos, it is because normally polonium is found in the
Uranium to Lead radioactive generations. Uranium is normally the parent
of polonium. However, the halos Gentry found indicated NO predecessor
element. In other words, Polonium itself was the very element that
was trapped in the rock when it formed.
The First Implications:
The problem for uniformitarianism
is that the Parentless PO218 halos Gentry found have a half life
of approximately 3 minutes. For all intents and purposes, in the space
of seven half lives of an element, the element is essentially gone
- it has broken down radioactively and doesn't exist anymore. In other words,
the Polonium that made these rings didn't exist for anymore than 21 minutes!
If the granite crust was ever in a molten state it would have destroyed the
rings! Yet, here they are, preserved for our viewing. What does
this mean?
The entire granite crust of the
earth,
essentially Earth itself, came into
existence in less than 21 minutes.
It gets better however: He also
found parentless halos from Polonium 214, a different isotope of the same
element. Whenever I hold a Creation science lecture I always offer
a quarter to anyone who can tell me the half-life of Polonium 214. Believe
it or not, I have lost my quarter on more than one occasion!
Polonium 214 has a half life
of 0.000 164 seconds! What does this mean?
A revised estimation would show
that the entire planet Earth itself
came into existence in less than
1/1000th of a second.
Literally as fast as you can snap your
fingers, Earth was there!
...But it gets better than that.
The effects of the
speed of light on Nuclear Physics:
There remains one small dilemna,
a slim possibility: That radio decay rates in the past were slower
than they are now. Now as ridiculous as this sounds, this could be
suggested. This would mean that radio decay rates slowed by many magnitudes
in order to achieve this result. As impossible as this might seem,
I didn't like the fact that there was two possible conclusions to this enigma.
Then the answer came to me - about two o'clock in the morning as I lay in
bed stewing over this. (What? Hasn't that happened to you?)
Back in 1981, an Australian by the
name of Barry Setterfield "resuggested" something that had already been proposed
before: That the speed of light appeared to be slowing down!2 He based this hypothesis on his studies of
the measurements taken of the speed of light over 250 years. Graphed, they
charted an apparent exponential decline.
Teaming up with a mathematician,
Trevor Norman, they used what was then the largest computer available in Australia
to calculate that the speed of light would have been infinite
6640 years ago, + or - 20 years
(Please see important
addendum for corrections to this page)
Besides the radical implication
that light had a beginning, (Gen 1:3) this seemingly impossible claim
has several lines of evidence which appear to corroborate this hypothesis.
For example, V.S. Troiski, (Radiophysical Research Institute, Gorky) a Soviet
scientist, had come to the same conclusion (that of a decaying speedof light)
by completely independent cosmological observations.3
Setterfield initially documented some 13 different "constants" (for examplePlanck's
constant), some of which would change relative to c while others would not:
they behaved exactly as would be predicted.
T.C. van Flandern (US naval observatory,
Washington) concluded after 26 years of comparing gravitational clocks
(such as moon orbits) to nuclear clocks that either gravitational clocks
were speeding up, or nuclear clocks were slowing down.4
Nuclear clocks slowing down would
be a predictable end result if the speed of light were decaying. Interestingly,
this brings up the very point I am trying to make: if the speed of light
were to increase, the speed at which radioactive particles decayed would
also increase. This seems to be implied even by some radiohalos themselves.
5
More
startling implications:
So let's now go back in time,
back to the formation of the earth. Now whether you subscribe to an
old earth age or a young one, the point remains the same: Anything approaching
6,000 years ago and the speed of light was infinite or near infinite.
So when this granite crust was formed, the half life of PO214
was, technically:
seconds
(Infinite inverted)
Now because you and I are finite
human beings who cannot understand infinite, I have endeavoured to explain
to people what this means in terms of just how fast this entire planet, our
home, terra ferma, came into existence. The best that I can do is:
This entire planet earth came
into existence at the speed of thought.
Now, based on this information,
I would ask: Does this evidence support a molten ball of lava naturally
cooling into a planet? Or does it support supernatural, ex-nihilo creation?
You be the judge.
References:
1. Dr. Robert V.
Gentry's publications on the subject of radiohalos is incredibly extensive.
You can view the list for yourself at his website, http://www.halos.com/report.htm
2. Barry Setterfield
has several articles on line, the reference is linked if available:
Barry Setterfield
and Trevor Norman: Atomic constants, light and time. 1987
Barry
Setterfield: The vacuum, light speed and the red shift 1999,
updated Feb 2000
3. V.S. Troiski, Astrophysics and Space
Science, Vol 139, 1987 (pp 389-411)
4. T.C. van Flandern, Is the Gravitational
Constant Changing? Precision Measurements and Fundamental Constants II,1984
(pp 625-627)
5. P. Ramdohr, 1957. Gentry documents
these blasting
halos on his web site, suggesting higher energies in the past from radioactive
decays. (Subtitle "Possible Evidence of Enhanced Radioactive Decay
from 'Blasting' Halos", RADIOACTIVE HALOS IN A RADIOCHRONOLOGICAL AND
COSMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
Addendum:
Upon further researching Setterfield's work on c-decay, I was never able
to find an exact reference to this pinpointed time. I had seen this
time referenced, commented on and "cited" in lots of places (both creationist
and evolutionist), but noone ever provided a reference, nor was I able to
find it in any of Barry's writings. In 2004 I specifically asked Barry
about the accuracy of the story, the history, and where he stands now on
this research.
In brief, this number (6640 yrs +/- 20 yrs) was merely from a progress report
and was not intended to be anything definitive. The 1987 report is
to be considered the first definitive work which supersedes all previous
reports.
I should also clarify that Barry has never suggested that the speed
of light was ever infinite. It has only been in the last few years
that the dataset for c measurements has been adequately complete to make
any predictions as to what the speed was, and when. He has made no
assertions as to when c might have had its origin.
I have left this page in its original form for two reasons: It is important
to acknowledge corrections, and that the essential arguments still stay the
same, even in light of this correction. Certainly within the span of
the Earth's genesis, supposedly several billion years ago, the speed
of light would have been infinite - thus the arguments still stand.
Barry's reports, data, and everything pertaining to this are available on
his website: www.setterfield.org
|
About
the Author:
Ian Juby is a technology education
assistant at a high school in Pembroke, Ontario. He has spent almost
twelve years in personal studies of human origins and presents the creation
model in schools, churches and private groups. He is a member of Youth
With A Mission and is registered with MensaCanada.
(Though in typical mensan fashion, he forgot to pay his membership fees and
has not had his membership renewed! -I.J.)
Click here for the next lesson...
|